|
|
|
April 2008 Elite Cow Statistics
|
Determination of elite or high-ranking grade status was based on a
two-stage screening procedure. The first-stage screening criteria for
eligibility were:
- Management groups included lactations of at least three other cows
when averaged across a cow's lactations.
- Last calving was within 2 years and 3 months of current evaluation date.
- Last record was either in progress (code R) or had a termination
code of 0 (blank), 1, 2, or 8.
- First lactation was not predominantly owner-sampler type of
test.
- Reliability of milk evaluation was at least 30%.
Summary information for eligible (those passing first-stage screening)
registered cows are in Table 1.
|
Table 1. Mean predicted transmitting abilities
(PTAs) for milk, fat, protein, productive life (PL), somatic cell score (SCS),
and net merit (NM) for registered1 cows passing first-stage screening.
| 7,825 |
41 |
51 |
2.5 |
1.7 |
2.98 |
0.7 |
1.06 |
| 19,415 |
89 |
164 |
6.8 |
5.7 |
2.99 |
1.5 |
-0.99 |
| 6,497 |
56 |
133 |
8.5 |
3.2 |
3.00 |
0.6 |
-1.24 |
| 562,436 |
109 |
238 |
9.9 |
7.6 |
2.97 |
0.9 |
-1.77 |
| 144,261 |
97 |
208 |
12.4 |
7.1 |
2.98 |
1.0 |
-0.30 |
| 3,590 |
94 |
312 |
13.9 |
9.4 |
3.01 |
0.6 |
1.39 |
| 1,678 |
13 |
-290 |
-2.0 |
-6.1 |
2.99 |
0.8 |
4.19 |
1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.
|
|
Table 2.
Standard deviations of PTAs for milk, fat, protein, PL, SCS, and NM for registered1
cows passing first-stage screening.
| 7,825 |
+/- 107 |
+/- 429 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 12 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.3 |
+/- 7.1 |
| 19,415 |
+/- 140 |
+/- 511 |
+/- 20 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 0.11 |
+/- 2 |
+/- 9.8 |
| 6,497 |
+/- 124 |
+/- 509 |
+/- 19 |
+/- 14 |
+/- 0.13 |
+/- 1.7 |
+/- 10.2 |
| 562,436 |
+/- 140 |
+/- 658 |
+/- 22 |
+/- 18 |
+/- 0.13 |
+/- 1.4 |
+/- 9.8 |
| 144,261 |
+/- 131 |
+/- 599 |
+/- 22 |
+/- 18 |
+/- 0.11 |
+/- 1.3 |
+/- 7.6 |
| 3,590 |
+/- 125 |
+/- 507 |
+/- 20 |
+/- 15 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.4 |
+/- 5.8 |
| 1,678 |
+/- 128 |
+/- 650 |
+/- 23 |
+/- 17 |
+/- 0.12 |
+/- 1.2 |
+/- 9.6 |
1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.
|
For registered eligible cows, a percentile table for each breed was
constructed based on NM. Those percentile tables are provided with USDA-DHIA
evaluations for active artificial-insemination bulls. A percentile was assigned for each cow with
data distributed in format 105. Although the data for Red and White cows are
combined with those for Holstein cows for genetic evaluations, a separate
percentile was used for screening Red and White cows
for elite or high-ranking grade status. The second-stage screening criterion was the
NM corresponding to a specified minimum percentile (Table 3).
|
Table 3.
Percentiles and corresponding NM for a cow to be designated as elite or a high-ranking grade and numbers by breed.
| 98 |
265 |
156 |
189 |
| 98 |
368 |
388 |
546 |
| 98 |
316 |
129 |
229 |
| 99 |
457 |
5,609 |
5,934 |
| 99 |
381 |
1,416 |
1,359 |
| 97 |
330 |
107 |
219 |
| 97 |
237 |
433 |
81 |
|
|