Beltsville \ BARC Animal & Natural Resources Animal Improvement Programs

    SEARCH AIPL
Browse By Subject
 


» New Query (Preview)
» General Queries
» Industry Queries
» Active AI Lists
» Top Bull Lists
» Elite Cow List
» Password
» Data Exchange
» E-mailing Lists
» Contact AIPL



April 2008 Elite Cow Statistics

Determination of elite or high-ranking grade status was based on a two-stage screening procedure. The first-stage screening criteria for eligibility were:

  • Management groups included lactations of at least three other cows when averaged across a cow's lactations.
  • Last calving was within 2 years and 3 months of current evaluation date.
  • Last record was either in progress (code R) or had a termination code of 0 (blank), 1, 2, or 8.
  • First lactation was not predominantly owner-sampler type of test.
  • Reliability of milk evaluation was at least 30%.

Summary information for eligible (those passing first-stage screening) registered cows are in Table 1.

Table 1. Mean predicted transmitting abilities (PTAs) for milk, fat, protein, productive life (PL), somatic cell score (SCS), and net merit (NM) for registered1 cows passing first-stage screening.

Breed Cows (no.) NM ($) PTA milk
(lb)
PTA fat
(lb)
PTA protein
(lb)
PTA SCS PTA PL
(mo)
PTA DPR
Ayrshire 7,825 41 51 2.5 1.7 2.98 0.7 1.06
Brown Swiss 19,415 89 164 6.8 5.7 2.99 1.5 -0.99
Guernsey 6,497 56 133 8.5 3.2 3.00 0.6 -1.24
Holstein 562,436 109 238 9.9 7.6 2.97 0.9 -1.77
Jersey 144,261 97 208 12.4 7.1 2.98 1.0 -0.30
Milking Shorthorn 3,590 94 312 13.9 9.4 3.01 0.6 1.39
Red and White 1,678 13 -290 -2.0 -6.1 2.99 0.8 4.19

   1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.


Table 2. Standard deviations of PTAs for milk, fat, protein, PL, SCS, and NM for registered1 cows passing first-stage screening.

Breed Cows (no.) NM ($) PTA milk
(lb)
PTA fat
(lb)
PTA protein
(lb)
PTA SCS PTA PL
(mo)
PTA DPR
Ayrshire 7,825 +/- 107 +/- 429 +/- 15 +/- 12 +/- 0.12 +/- 1.3 +/- 7.1
Brown Swiss 19,415 +/- 140 +/- 511 +/- 20 +/- 15 +/- 0.11 +/- 2 +/- 9.8
Guernsey 6,497 +/- 124 +/- 509 +/- 19 +/- 14 +/- 0.13 +/- 1.7 +/- 10.2
Holstein 562,436 +/- 140 +/- 658 +/- 22 +/- 18 +/- 0.13 +/- 1.4 +/- 9.8
Jersey 144,261 +/- 131 +/- 599 +/- 22 +/- 18 +/- 0.11 +/- 1.3 +/- 7.6
Milking Shorthorn 3,590 +/- 125 +/- 507 +/- 20 +/- 15 +/- 0.12 +/- 1.4 +/- 5.8
Red and White 1,678 +/- 128 +/- 650 +/- 23 +/- 17 +/- 0.12 +/- 1.2 +/- 9.6

   1Includes cows in an identity enrollment program for some breeds.

For registered eligible cows, a percentile table for each breed was constructed based on NM. Those percentile tables are provided with USDA-DHIA evaluations for active artificial-insemination bulls. A percentile was assigned for each cow with data distributed in format 105. Although the data for Red and White cows are combined with those for Holstein cows for genetic evaluations, a separate percentile was used for screening Red and White cows for elite or high-ranking grade status. The second-stage screening criterion was the NM corresponding to a specified minimum percentile (Table 3).

Table 3. Percentiles and corresponding NM for a cow to be designated as elite or a high-ranking grade and numbers by breed.

Evaluation
Breed
Minimum
percentile
Minimum
NM ($)
Elite cows
(no.)
High-ranking
grade cows (no.)
Ayrshire 98 265 156 189
Brown Swiss 98 368 388 546
Guernsey 98 316 129 229
Holstein 99 457 5,609 5,934
Jersey 99 381 1,416 1,359
Milking Shorthorn 97 330 107 219
Red and White 97 237 433 81



Last Modified: 04/27/2007