|
|
|
|
|
|
Service bull |
|
Sperm motility, abnormality, etc. measured by AI
companies |
|
ERCR ratings from DRMS@Raleigh |
|
Environment and genes of cow |
|
Interaction of bull and cow |
|
Lethal recessives, inbreeding |
|
|
|
|
|
Rate that cows become pregnant |
|
Can be derived from days open |
|
Non-linear: 21 / (DO – VWP + 11) |
|
Linear approx: (233 – DO) / 4 |
|
Advantages over days open |
|
Positive numbers are desirable |
|
Earlier measure of herd fertility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lactations 1-5 beginning with 1960 |
|
Data sources |
|
Reported DO confirmed with next calving |
|
Exclude most recent 9 months |
|
Reported DO if no next calving |
|
Exclude most recent 9 months |
|
Calving interval – 280 days if no reported DO |
|
Exclude most recent 18 months |
|
Assigned DO = 250 if sold for infertility |
|
|
|
|
|
BLUP Animal Model |
|
Same programs used for yield, PL, SCS |
|
Convert to preg rate = (233 – DO) / 4 |
|
Adjust for heterogeneous variance |
|
Parameter estimates used: |
|
Heritability = 4% |
|
Repeatability = 11% |
|
Sire-by-herd interaction = 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Holstein data from Aug 2002 evaluation |
|
40 million lactations |
|
16 million cows |
|
Statistics for recent, well-sampled bulls |
|
Born 1994 - 1997 |
|
Milk REL > 80% (mean = 87%) |
|
4215 Holstein bulls |
|
314 Jersey bulls |
|
Example evaluations for older sires |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daughter Pregnancy Rate has low heritability (~4%)
but high genetic correlation with Productive Life (>.5) |
|
Official evaluations for DPR planned for
February 2003 |
|
Selection on PL has greatly reduced the decline
in cow fertility |
|
Economic value not yet determined |
|
|
|
|
All DHIA herds and processing centers
contributed data |
|
George Wiggans and Lillian Bacheller improved
the fertility database |
|
John Clay suggested expressing cow fertility as
pregnancy rate |
|