Changes to evaluation system (August
2008)
Service sire conception
rate
By Duane Norman, Melvin Kuhn, Jana Hutchison, and Jan Wright
Bull fertility evaluations called Estimated Relative Conception Rate
(ERCR) were provided to the industry by Dairy Records Management Systems (DRMS)
from 1986 to November 2005. In May 2006, AIPL assumed responsibility for
evaluation of U.S. bull fertility. As an initial step, AIPL implemented the
ERCR evaluation as previously computed by DRMS. Since 2006, the scope of the
data was broadened from regional to national, and the model and edits were
improved to increase reliability. Those efforts are ready for implementation
for August 2008. The new evaluation will be called Sire Conception Rate (SCR)
and will be based on conception rate rather than non-return rate. SCR will also
utilize multiple services per lactation (up to 7), rather than first service
only. Data will be primarily from 3 of the 4 major DRPCs, which is also an
enhancement relative to previous evaluations. For the sake of improving
reliability, the evaluation will also utilize what has been called an "expanded
service sire term." This involves estimating components affecting bull
fertility separately and then formulating the prediction as a sum of the
components. In contrast to ERCR, SCR will be reported with one decimal.
Evaluations will be expressed as deviations from the overall mean; an SCR of
1.2, for example, means that the bull is 1.2% above average, -1.2 would mean he
is 1.2% below average, and 0.0 would mean he is average. All 6 traditional U.S.
dairy breeds will be evaluated, provided sufficient data are available. To be
publishable, a bull must have an AI status other than inactive and cannot be
more than 13 years old. Holstein bulls must have at least 300 total breedings,
100 breedings in the most recent 12 months, and at least 10 herds. Minimum
number of matings and herds are somewhat less for the other breeds, in order to
allow for more publishable bulls. For more details, refer to
http://aipl.arsusda.gov/reference/arr-scr1.htm.
Genetic evaluations for
clones
By Paul VanRaden and Gary Fok
Cloned bulls now receive the same genetic evaluation as the clonal
family member the with highest reliability. Generally this is the original
animal that the others were cloned from. All fields in format 38 except
identification fields are copied, such as predicted transmitting abilities,
reliabilities, daughters, herds, etc. This same policy was already introduced
in the Holstein Association Sire Summaries (red book) beginning in April 2008.
A “3” in column 363 of format 38 indicates a cloned bull; the bull
identified in column 530-546 indicates the source of the evaluation. Please
note that column 363 is also used to indicate the Interbull preferred ID code.
When genomic evaluations are introduced, evaluations that combine
daughters and records from all clones will be provided instead of choosing the
one with highest reliability to represent the others.
More traits of foreign sires used
in cow evaluations
By Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Gary Fok
Procedures to incorporate multi-trait across country evaluations
(MACE) of sires into daughter evaluations have been extended to more traits.
Yield traits from the previous evaluation were incorporated since
November
1999, and these same procedures are now used for productive life, somatic
cell score, and daughter pregnancy rate. NOTICE: All coding for this project is
not yet complete as of July.
Reporting genetic recessive
codes
By George Wiggans and Leigh Walton
Genetic recessive codes are being provided for more bulls. Previously
these codes were provided for bulls with a USA identification (ID). Now all
bulls that have recessive codes provided by the Holstein Association or have
codes included in their names will have their codes included in the recessives
codes field. The name is searched for Brown Swiss, Jersey, and Holstein bulls
with foreign ID. This change extends reporting to RF-ID with 840 country codes
also.