JDS (none)
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


J. Dairy Sci. 2007. 90:3937-3944. doi:10.3168/jds.2006-890
© 2007 American Dairy Science Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norman, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, G.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, G.

Consistency of Maturity Rate for Milk Yield Across Countries and Generations

H. D. Norman*,1, J. R. Wright*, R. L. Powell*, P. M. VanRaden*, F. Miglior{dagger},{ddagger} and G. de Jong§

* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
{dagger} Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1M 1Z3
{ddagger} Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G T42
§ Nederlands Rundvee Syndicaat (NRS), Arnhem, the Netherlands

1 Corresponding author: dnorman{at}aipl.arsusda.gov

Differences among bulls in maturity rate of their daughters for milk yield were investigated. Milk records for US Holsteins with first-parity calving dates between 1960 and 1998 were used to calculate 3 evaluations for bulls based on daughter records from parity 1, parities 1 and 2, and parities 1, 2, and 3. The 3 evaluations were used to estimate parity-specific evaluations for parities 2 and 3. Maturity rate of Holstein bull daughters in Canada and the Netherlands was compared with that for daughters of the same bulls in the United States by using official November 2004 Canadian and August 2005 Dutch parity-specific evaluations. For bulls with ≥500 first-parity daughters, correlations among parity-specific evaluations within country and birth year of bull were 0.88 between parities 1 and 2, 0.84 between parities 1 and 3, and 0.96 between parities 2 and 3 for the United States; 0.90, 0.86, and 0.97, respectively, for Canada; and 0.92, 0.89, and 0.98, respectively, for the Netherlands. Correlations between Canada and the United States for within-country differences between evaluations for parities 1 and 2 were 0.72 for bulls with ≥50 first-parity daughters and 0.89 for bulls with ≥500 first-parity daughters; corresponding correlations between the Netherlands and the United States were 0.66 and 0.82. Correlations between countries for differences between evaluations for parities 1 and 3 were slightly less, and corresponding correlations between evaluations for parities 2 and 3 were still lower. To establish whether differences between parity-specific evaluations were genetic, comparisons were made across a generation. Coefficients for regression of son on sire within country and birth years of sire and son for parity-specific evaluations and differences between parity-specific evaluations ranged from 0.35 to 0.53, with standard errors of ≤0.04. Differences in maturity rate of bull daughters were quite consistent across country, and those differences were transmitted to the sons’ daughters. Modeling to account for maturity differences should increase the accuracy of US evaluations and reduce fluctuation between evaluations, especially for bulls with daughters that deviate substantially from the population mean for maturity rate for milk yield.

Key Words: genetic evaluation • maturity rate • milk yield • parity

Copyright © 2007 by the American Dairy Science Association.